Most Popular

Most Viewed
Most Commented
News
"Most Popular" tools sponsored by:
Recent Articles
Related Articles

National Features

  • Seattle Weekly
    Back from Iraq

    Camaraderie is in short supply between today's soldiers and older vets.

    By Nina Shapiro
  • Village Voice
    Scientology 's Celebrity Defector

    TV star Jason Beghe reveals secrets of the controversial church.

    By Tony Ortega
  • Riverfront Times
    Line Up, Tough Guys

    Here's an idea: Let felons become bail bondsmen.

    By Keegan Hamilton

It looked good recently for a proposed law in Missouri that would make roads safer for cyclists. But then the Missouri Department of Transportation threw up a the state capitol version of a flashing-orange-light-topped barricade in front of the Complete Streets bill.

Brent Hugh, the director of the Missouri Bicycle Federation, says the group had been working all year with MoDOT and the Complete Street bill sponsor, Representative Mike Sutherland, a Republican from Warrenton. The original version of the bill would have required MoDOT to use a “reasonable amount” of any road funds for bike and pedestrian accommodations, like “Share the Road” signs and crosswalks. It was watered down to make MoDOT more comfortable and the final version got a green light in the House, passing by a 139-9 vote.

The measure went to a Senate committee last week, with cycling advocates confident that MoDOT was on board. Instead, the agency pulled a U-turn. “It was an absolute and complete surprise when they came to the hearing and made it very clear that MoDOT now opposed the bill,” Hugh says.

MoDOT spokesman Jeff Briggs says his agency supports bicycles and pedestrians wherever they can, but they oppose to the Complete Streets measure. MoDOT already includes community feedback in setting priorities and providing input for its projects, Briggs says. “Typically, bike-ped needs rank pretty low, so we’re concerned that if we work this into the statutes we could end up being committed to a great deal of funding for not necessarily what the public is telling us they want.”

Briggs adds that MoDOT is facing a financial crunch in the next couple years and will have to start saying no to many groups. “In that environment, adding a new requirement to add a bike lane or a bike path on a street might be especially challenging,” he says. But, Briggs adds, the agency promised legislators it would make sure its internal polices take note of cyclists’ needs.

Bike advocates don’t buy that argument. Providing for cyclists and pedestrians gives taxpayers the biggest bang for their transportation bucks, Hugh says. In many communities, most roads are fairly friendly to non-motorized travel already. “By far the biggest barriers to safe walking and bicycling in most Missouri cities are MoDOT roads — you can’t travel on them and, in some cases, you can’t even cross them safely.”

And when Briggs says MoDOT is already looking out for those on two wheels, many cycling advocates are more than a little skeptical. Case in point: the new Paseo Bridge. True, MoDOT did take cyclists into consideration. The agency agreed to include bike lanes on this river crossing. But only if other agencies come up with an estimated $3 million to build the ramps. Maybe that’s what MoDOT meant when its administrators say they aren’t in favor of Complete Streets.

So when the agency holds its ceremonial ground breaking for the new Paseo Bridge at 2 p.m. this Friday, April 18, cyclists are planning a caravan to the event. To join the group, check out the meet-up details at Let’s Go KC.

Click here to send a letter to the editor.

Write Your Comment show comments (1)
  1. "MoDOT already includes community feedback in setting priorities and providing input for its projects, Briggs says. 'Typically, bike-ped needs rank pretty low . . . '"

    1. There are two million bicyclists in Missouri. We saw almost half a million of them out in person at the recent Tour of Missouri. So if MoDOT's community feedback is finding that "bike-ped needs rank pretty low", it sounds more like an indictment of MoDOT's methods of gathering community feedback than the fact that there is no community support.

    2. And that is not even mentioning the 25-30% of Missourians with no driver's license (over 10% of adults). And the 8.3% of Missouri households with no car. Perhaps MoDOT's community feedback programs are failing to reach these taxpaying citizens or meet their needs?

    3. To be specific, in the case of the Paseo Bridge, Kansas City area citizens have sent in over 3000 letters and emails at different stages of the public input process. The amount of public feedback on the issue of bicycle & pedestrian accommodation dwarfs the amount received for any other aspect of the project.

    Yet right now MoDOT has not made a commitment to spend even one cent of the quarter billion dollar Paseo Bridge project to provide a way for people on foot or on bicycle to cross the Missouri River. (To their credit they found a clever way to potentially fit 10 feet of space for a bike/ped path on the bridge deck. However they are not even willing to spend 0.1% of the project's budget to make that potential 10 feet become a real bike/ped path. MoDOT has knack for making pacifying gestures like that, that cost them nothing but also turn out to amount to nothing in the end.)

    In a time when gas prices are well over $3/gallon, greenhouse gas emissions are a global concern, and cities and states across the U.S. and world are re-discovering the value of building roads and streets for people, not just automobiles, MoDOT needs to remember this:

    It is the Department of TRANSPORTATION, not just the Department of Single Occupant Automobiles.

The Pitch Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff